You are cordially invited to comment on these papers.

Comments can range from short remarks to full reviews.  We encourage you to be frank, but polite. As a rule, commentators should give their name. If they fear hurting their relationship with authors, they can use an alias, which has to be clearly recognizable as such. Editors will vet comments before publication to make sure appropriate and comprehensible language is used and that they are  substantive comments relating to the content of the paper at hand. Standards of fairness will be particularly high if an alias is used. Authors who have submitted a paper for open peer review are strongly encouraged to take part in this collaborative effort by reading and commenting on papers of other authors. We thank all contributors very much for their time and input.

All papers by date

Are Financial Markets Stable? A Survey of Three Theories of Financial Markets in Light of the 2008 Crisis

The purpose of this essay will be to examine theories of financial stability and instability with the view to eventually establishing whether financial markets are inherently stable or unstable, especially in light of the evidence thrown up by the worldwide financial crisis of 2008.  We will begin by examining the three major existing theories of … Continue reading »

Read the abstract and download the paper »
Posted for review 3 May 2013

Read the comments »
No comments

On the Historical, Moral and Economic Arguments for Asymmetric Trading Regimes: the case of sub-Saharan Africa

The Least Developed Countries Report 2006 argued that a paradigm shift in national and international policies to promote development and poverty reduction is required because current policies are inadequate and have failed to develop productive capacities in the underdeveloped economies. However, the policies that are advocated do not deal with the fundamental question of how … Continue reading »

Read the abstract and download the paper »
Posted for review 16 Apr 2013

Read the comments »
2 comments

A comment on the critiques of the neoclassical firm theory

This paper investigates into some of major errors made by Steve Keen and Rus- sell Standish (K-S) in their papers in Utilities Policy and Real-World Economics Review. The most important error that this paper nds is the wrong use of cal- culus that makes price (or demand) function of market inapplicable for calculus usage. This … Continue reading »

Read the abstract and download the paper »
Posted for review 16 Apr 2013

Read the comments »
15 comments

Agriculture-industry relation and the question of ‘home market’: Towards closing a centuries old debate

In our journey through the literature on ‘home market’ for industry we find that time and again agriculture has been identified as the potential sector. However, our basic point is that, it is rather the appropriate government intervention creating scope for Kaleckian ‘domestic exports’ that can mitigate the short-run problem of ‘effective demand’ faced by … Continue reading »

Read the abstract and download the paper »
Posted for review 13 Mar 2013

Read the comments »
7 comments

The Real Causes of Inflation

Having defined what is inflation, this article proposes some hypothesizes to eliminate external and psychological factors; it also examines a closed economy. It shows that the deep cause of inflation is the out of balance relation between consumption expenditure and saving. If consumption expenditure increases more than saving, the result is an inflation of the … Continue reading »

Read the abstract and download the paper »
Posted for review 13 Feb 2013

Read the comments »
4 comments

Macro Policies for Climate Change: Free Market or State Intervention?

The central issue studied in this essay is the meaning and implications for public policy of Nicholas Stern’s statement that “Climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen” (Stern, 2006). To deal with this issue we analyze first the two big currents about public policy measures in general: market oriented and state … Continue reading »

Read the abstract and download the paper »
Posted for review 14 Dec 2012

Read the comments »
No comments

A Neoclassical Curmudgeon Looks at Heterodox Criticisms of Microeconomics

The purpose of this paper is to open a dialogue with heterodox economists about what is valid in heterodox criticisms of neoclassical microeconomics.  A criticism is valid if (i) it is based on an accurate representation of the analysis, theory, or model in question and (ii) it points out genuine logical weaknesses or actual mistakes … Continue reading »

Read the abstract and download the paper »
Posted for review 20 Nov 2012

Read the comments »
9 comments

About Simple Economic Reproduction and Macroeconomic Indicators

Reproduction is infinitely renewable, continuous production process. This means that as a result of production its premises, conditions for continuing production are also reproduced. Without the understanding of this process, cannot be explained the functioning of economy, as an integrity, as a living organism. Neoclassical theory considers the production of goods as a unidirectional process … Continue reading »

Read the abstract and download the paper »
Posted for review 29 Sep 2012

Read the comments »
No comments